After 250 years, the Republic is still standing. Amazing.

After 250 years, the unique nation created by our Founders is still standing. It holds the record for the oldest continuous constitutional representative democracy among the larger modern countries. Something to be proud of. Slaves? Patriarchy? That got fixed as the Founders intended.

The U.S. is on the eve of its 250th birthday. Traditionally, around the 4th of July, there is a plethora of polls that measure national pride, patriotism, and confidence in the country. Given unrest persistently reported by media, economic challenges like widening income inequality, and the increasingly unreachable American dream, one would think that the majority of Americans have given up on their country. Interestingly, not so.

  • The Gallup Poll of May 2026, published June 24, 2026, reports:

77% of Americans say the Founding Fathers would be disappointed, compared with 71% in 2013 and 42% in 2001. The view is shared across party, age, income and race.

The same poll also reports that the majority of Americans say the nation has made progress on its founding ideals; a view measured at 84% in 2002 and 77% in 1976.

Although the percentage of those who see progress has decreased, “The contrast between the two suggests Americans distinguish between the country’s long arc and its current state,” Gallup concludes.

  • There is another way of expressing what the Gallup Poll reported.

Most Americans see the difference between nation and government – between the Founders’ ideals enshrined in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, and the disorder created by the elected humans that govern.

When in the midst of establishing the nation, the Founders considered the writings of thinkers like Cicero, John Locke, Montesquieu, and Adam Smith. They studied governing documents like the Magna Carta. And they came up with a unique system of government, unheard of at the time.

The system included a written Constitution, instead of an amalgamation of traditions and laws; it aimed for checks and balances via three separate branches of government exercising equal power, instead of a central ruling body; it provided for a share of powers between the federal and individual state governments; it was a Republic in which the populace was represented by elected officials, instead of a direct Democracy which the Founders considered “mob rule;” and its engine of prosperity was the free market described by Adam Smith.

After 250 years, that system is still standing and holds the record for the oldest continuous constitutional representative democracy among the larger modern countries.

  • Wait, what about slavery?

The recent major polls all agree with Gallup’s assessment of the majority of Americans’ complex feelings of pride in the nation the Founders created, hope that improvements can continue to be made, and high levels of frustration with current challenges.

But there is a minority, with laser focus on the Founders’ shortcomings: All men are created equal, except for slaves and women. People are born with unalienable rights, except slaves and women.

What this minority fails to incorporate in their arguments is that the Founders allowed Americans to make changes to the Constitution as circumstances changed.

Their circumstances included an agrarian South depended on slave labor that would not have stayed in the Union if the newly-created government did away with slavery (Abraham Lincoln took a different path; the Civil War claimed 690,000 souls, but did end slavery).

Their circumstances also included the fact that women in the world’s major powers – England, France, and Germany – could not vote. Maybe the Founders, in spite of breaking so much new historical ground, balked at being pioneers in the women’s suffrage issue.

  • Enjoy your 4th of July

Picture: (Editor’s note) This is a picture of one of the two main streets in the small Southern town in which I live (48,000 residents). That’s what it looks like all the time, not just dressing up for the 4th of July. Nothing to do with partisanship either, since nothing changed when last November voters replaced a Republican Mayor with a Democratic one.

Walter E. Williams Told It Like It Is – RIP

Walter E. Williams, distinguished professor of Economics at George Mason University and advocate of free markets for everyone, died on December 1, 2020. With his passing, a voice raised against the devastation inflicted upon the poor by well-intentioned government policies was lost.

Walter E. Williams, distinguished professor of Economics at George Mason University and advocate of free markets for everyone, died on December 1, 2020. With his passing, a voice raised against the devastation inflicted upon the poor by well-intentioned government policies was lost.

Professor Williams was a plain-speaking, straight-talking economist, with credibility to speak about the poor since he himself came up from the projects.

He Suffered No Fools

His 2010 autobiography Up from the Projects became the basis for a 2014 PBS documentary, Suffer No Fools. Here, as in his other 10 books and widely syndicated newspaper column, Dr. Williams enumerated good intentions that produced bad results.

The PBS documentary features a relaxed interview with Dr. Williams and some of his contemporaries. The point throughout is that government intervention aimed at equality of results, or equity, does more harm than good. Although Professor Williams was not alone in espousing this perspective, he was uniquely emphatic.

Highlights of Suffer No Fools

Here are some of the points Professor Williams makes.

* The Great Society of Lyndon Johnson led to dependence on government largess instead of dependence on individual effort.

* Expectations of equality of results through government intervention replaced efforts to excel.

* Government is like a giant drug pusher. The system encouraged the propagation of poverty pimps that make a living on the grievances of the poor.

* Dependence promotes “spiritual poverty” — more significant than economic poverty because it more readily builds a cycle of tolerance for dependence.

* Spiritual poverty is seen in communities where traditional families and dedication to education is absent.

* The market pays people what the market determines people’s skills are worth. Teens who receive “a fraudulent education” in inadequate schools and have no work experience are denied the opportunity to get their foot on the first rung of the ladder to success when government demands they get paid more than the market says their skills are worth.

* Government stifles opportunity for economic success, especially for the poor, by mandating minimum wages, expensive business licenses, taxi medallions and other draconian regulations. Government conspires with insiders to keep newcomers out.

* When young, Professor Williams identified more with the militancy of Malcom X than with the philosophy of “forgiving the enemy” of Martin Luther King. As he matured, Williams began to see that salvation from poverty fares better in the free marketplace arena than in government’s political arena.

* Great empires of the past went down the tubes doing what our society is doing now – dwelling on the political arena rather than the free market arena.

* Slavery, rape, murder are actions that violate private property, including the ownership of one’s own self. Who owns you?

Progressive Economics vs. Laissez Faire

Dr. Williams’ admonitions sound radical. Our society today is focused on government’s obligation to attain equity and social justice through regulation and mandate. Private property and individual achievement are viewed with disdain. Laissez-faire economics has been replaced by progressive economics, and true capitalism replaced by crony capitalism.

Economics is not a science but a set of beliefs. Laissez faire believes that the free market is the best arena for the creation of opportunities that lead to economic wellbeing. Economic progressives believe intervention and control produce the best results through engineered social equity.

The New Wave: Progressive Economics

Here is an example of the progressive economics that Walter Williams excoriated every chance he got – an opinion piece in the Washington Post dated November 11, 2020, written by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA). Senator Warren expressed her view of how the Biden-Harris ticket unseated an incumbent President, and what the priorities for the new administration should be.

They ran on explicit plans to create new union jobs in clean energy, increase Social Security benefits, expand health care, cancel billions of dollars in student-loan debt, hold law enforcement accountable, make the wealthy pay their fair share, tackle climate change and provide for universal child care. … The lesson is clear. Bold policies to improve opportunity for all Americans are broadly popular. Voters recognize that these reforms are necessary to fix what is broken in our nation.

In progressive politics “opportunity” means government largess showered upon selected groups.

The Passing Wave of Laissez Faire

Black Washingtonians were proud of what they had created. In 1921 the Washington Bee, the city’s largest black paper, editorialized that the growth of black business in Washington, “more than anything else, marks real and prominent racial progress.” The thriving business district was a symbol of what blacks could achieve. As one longtime resident of the area put it in 1988, “If you were on U Street, you didn’t need to go anywhere else. It was all right there for you. Blacks had a society put together on this street.” …

Today, the city’s black aristocracy, like the thriving communities it created, exists mostly in memories. In its place are Washington’s new black leaders: the civil rights class that took power in the District nearly 30 years ago. As it turned out, the two groups could not coexist in Washington.” Washington’s Lost Black Aristocracy, Autumn 1996

No, the two groups could not have possibly coexisted.